A-Trader for Prop Firms. The platform built this decade, not the last one

The thesis / 01

Your trading platform is the first impression. And the last memory.

Funded traders try your platform on day one. They reach a verdict in about ninety seconds. If it feels like 2010 (sluggish, ugly, missing tools they have on their personal terminal) your retention is broken before the marketing dollar that brought them even closes the loop. The platform is the product. For most prop firms running MT5 in 2026, the product is unrecognizable to a serious trader. That's a business problem, not a technology problem.

A prop firm running MT5 in 2026 is a hotel running a 2010 booking site. The room can be beautiful. The guest decides before they get to it.

What your traders see today

The old guard.

MT5: a Windows interface visually frozen in 2005
cTrader: better looking, but support is slowing, ecosystem is shrinking
Match-Trader: modern web, but a clone of every other modern web
TradeLocker: limited customization, no apps, generic feel
Mobile: an afterthought across all four, missing key features vs desktop
No apps ecosystem · no programmability worth using · no community layer
No built-in risk system · you license one separately for ~$30K/month
Every platform is pure cost · zero revenue ever flows back to your firm
MetaQuotes can shut your MT5 server tomorrow if you cross a policy line
Your "white-label" platform looks identical to every competitor's

What A-Trader gives them

The 2026 platform.

A-Trader: a platform designed in the last 24 months · not the last 24 years
Full custom branding · your logo · your colors · your domain · your firm's identity
True mobile parity: same features, same UX, on phone and watch
14 premium apps · 30%+ of traders subscribe · you share in the recurring revenue
A-Connect: institutional-grade risk controls built in · saves ~$30K/mo vs separate
Strategy Lab Python SDK · institutional-grade backtester · keeps your serious traders engaged
The Arena · ranked tournaments, duels, seasons · the gamification layer that retains
the Desk + community · the platform that helps your traders become their best version
The only platform that's a revenue stream, not a cost

The comparison / 02

Seventeen dimensions. One winner.

The trading platform category has four serious competitors and one dinosaur. The dinosaur (MT5) is what most prop firms still run, mostly out of inertia. The three modern options (cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker) are each missing something fundamental. Apps, programmability, integrated risk, revenue upside, or polish. A-Trader is the only one with all of it. Compare across every dimension that matters and the conclusion isn't subtle.

Dimension

MT5The dinosaur

cTraderNiche legacy

Match-TraderThe clone

TradeLockerThe generic

A-TraderThe 2026 platform

Platform / license cost

$10K–$25K/mo licensed

$5K+/mo + per-account

$2.5K → $10K → $25K tiers

Custom · talk to us

Custom · talk to us · premium tier · no per-account gotchas

Time to launch

2–4 weeks (typical)

2–3 weeks

1–2 weeks

5–7 days

7 days · same as the fastest

Intelligent apps

None. A chart and an order ticket.

None. cAlgo for indicators.

None. Generic plugin model.

None. Basic charting only.

14 apps: Candle Intel, Risk, VaR, Psychology, Sentiment, Flow, more

Programmability

MQL5. 2005 language, declining community

cAlgo C#. Niche, slow ecosystem

Limited plugin API

None worth using

Strategy Lab Python SDK · full ecosystem · pip-installable

Custom branding

Logo and colors only

Logo, colors, limited surfaces

Limited. Admits no full custom in marketing

Full custom. Your domain, your brand, every surface

Mobile parity

Poor. Feature-stripped app

Poor. Incomplete feature set

OK. Modern but limited

OK. Basic functionality

Full. Same feature set, watch app, native iOS/Android

Execution latency

~50–100ms depending on bridge

~30–60ms

~25–50ms

~30–80ms

<15ms p99 via A-Connect

Competition / gamification

None native

Arena: ranked tournaments, duels, seasons. Built-in

Trader preference

Falling. Younger traders openly mock it.

Niche. Loyal but small base.

Improving but generic.

New, unproven preference.

$40B+ monthly volume · 30%+ subscribe to premium apps · premium feel

Platform stability risk

MetaQuotes can shut your server. Has happened to others.

Vendor-stable, slowing investment

Vendor-stable, mid-tier

Startup-stage vendor risk

Arizet-owned · aggressive shipping · skin in the game

API-first integration

No. Manager-API workarounds

Limited REST surface

Reasonable REST

REST + gRPC + webhooks · plug into any CRM in 2–4 wks

Pace of development

Stagnant. MT5 hasn't materially evolved in 5+ years.

Slow. Quarterly updates at best.

Moderate. Mostly bug fixes.

Active but young. Direction can shift.

Weekly shipping. 14 apps in pipeline. Roadmap is public.

Trader differentiation

Zero. Every MT5 firm looks identical

Zero. Every cTrader firm looks identical

Zero. Every Match-Trader firm looks identical

Zero. Every TradeLocker firm looks identical

The platform itself is differentiation. No one else can offer A-Trader.

Strategic upside

None. Best case: tread water.

Limited. Maintenance mode.

Average. Stay competitive.

Modest. Generic upside.

Asymmetric. Be the firm associated with the platform traders want next.

Built-in risk system

None. License separately for ~$30K/mo.

None. Separate vendor.

A-Connect institutional risk controls · included · ~$30K/mo saved

Realistic simulated execution

Strategy tester famously misleading

Demo accounts ≠ real fills

Same engine as live execution · paper trading matches live · zero surprise

Revenue back to your firm

Zero · pure cost

30%+ of traders buy premium apps · negotiated revenue share to your firm

Trader growth focus

Just a terminal · no education · no community

Just trading · no growth layer

the Desk + Apps + Arena + Strategy Lab · the platform that helps traders become their best version

What's included / 03

Everything a serious trader needs.

A-Trader for Prop Firms is the complete platform license, not a stripped-down B2B variant of the consumer product. Your traders get the full A-Trader experience: the platform that becomes a natural extension of the trader, with the apps that help them become their best version, the Arena that keeps them engaged, the Desk that supports their growth. Six core capabilities, all included, all live from day one.

01 · Trading platform

▸

A-Trader, your brand

The full A-Trader experience: desktop, web, iOS, Android, watch. Drag-less precision charting. 800+ instruments. Multi-asset. Your firm's brand on every surface, your domain on the web, your colors throughout.

↳ desktop · web · mobile · watch ↳ 800+ instruments, multi-asset ↳ your domain · your brand · your firm ↳ same experience traders pay for retail

02 · Execution + risk

≈

A-Connect

The execution layer behind A-Trader. Sub-15ms p99 latency. Multi-venue smart order routing. Institutional-grade risk controls built in. Pre-trade checks, exposure limits, drawdown enforcement, news-window lockouts. The kind of risk infrastructure firms typically license separately for ~$30K/month. Plus simulated execution that actually matches live. Your traders' paper accounts use the same fill engine as production, so what they see in practice is what they get in funded.

↳ <15ms p99 execution latency ↳ institutional risk controls · ~$30K/mo value ↳ paper = live · same fill engine ↳ tier-1 LPs included · BYO supported

03 · Premium apps

◇

14 apps · recurring revenue

Candle Intelligence, Market Scanner, Trade Analytics, Risk Exposure, VaR Analysis, Scenario Testing, Trading Psychology, plus seven more in pipeline. 30%+ of active traders subscribe to one or more apps. Every subscription is recurring revenue, and a negotiated share flows back to your firm. The apps help your traders become better, and turn your platform into a revenue line, not a cost center.

↳ 7 live + 7 pipeline apps ↳ 30%+ of traders subscribe ↳ negotiated revenue share to your firm ↳ no other platform offers this

04 · Strategy Lab

⌬

Python SDK + backtester

The systematic trading layer. Your serious traders who code get a real Python SDK, an institutional-grade backtester, and access to a marketplace of forkable strategies. The advanced layer that retains your best traders, and the apps revenue share applies to Strategy Lab Pro subscriptions too.

↳ Python 3.12 SDK ↳ event-driven backtester ↳ 400+ library strategies ↳ paper → live, one code path

05 · The Arena

⚔

Gamification layer

Ranked tournaments. Duels. Seasons. Sponsored cups. The competitive layer that turns your traders into community members, and community members into long-tail LTV. Your firm sponsors cups; your brand sits on the prize.

↳ ranked seasons + tiers ↳ daily / weekly competitions ↳ head-to-head duels ↳ sponsored cup framework

06 · API surface

∞

Integrate, don't migrate

REST, gRPC, and webhook surfaces for every platform primitive. Account creation, rule configuration, trade events, risk events, payouts. Plug A-Trader into your existing CRM in 2–4 weeks. Keep what works. Add what doesn't.

↳ REST · gRPC · webhooks ↳ SDKs: Python, Node, Go ↳ 2–4 week integration typical ↳ no rip-and-replace required

Integration / 04

Your CRM stays. Our platform integrates.

Every prop firm has a CRM story. Some built it in-house. Some run FPFX or Axcera or YourPropFirm. Some duct-taped HubSpot and a developer. Whatever you've built, you don't have to throw it away. A-Trader for Prop Firms is API-first. Account events, trade events, risk events, payout triggers. All available via REST, gRPC, or webhooks. Plug A-Trader into your existing operations in 2–4 weeks. The platform is the upgrade. The plumbing is the same.

No migration · No rip-and-replace · Just integration

Two weeks to integrated. Forever to operate.

The standard A-Trader for Prop Firms integration ships in a 2–4 week engagement with our integrations team. We provision the platform tenant. You point your CRM's account-provisioning at our API. Trade and risk events flow back to your CRM via webhook. Your operations team sees the same dashboards they see today; your traders see a vastly better platform.

What we plug into:

Your CRM · FPFX, Axcera, YourPropFirm, PropAccount, custom. Whatever you run
Your risk dashboard · we send the trade and exposure events, you keep your views
Your payout system · the platform tells your system when to pay; your system pays
Your KYC / compliance · we accept verified accounts, you control the verification
Your reporting · all platform events available as raw data for your warehouse

A-TRADER API · INTEGRATION EXAMPLE REST · gRPC · WEBHOOKS

# Provision a funded account from your CRM
POST /v1/accounts
{
  "firm_id": "your_firm",
  "trader_id": "crm_trader_2841",
  "program": "50k_2step",
  "rules": { ... }
}

# Subscribe to live trade events
WEBHOOK your-firm.com/atrader/events
→ { "event": "trade_executed", ... }
→ { "event": "rule_warning", ... }
→ { "event": "daily_drawdown_50pct", ... }

# Update rules per pool on the fly
PATCH /v1/pools/{pool_id}/rules
{ "max_daily_dd": 0.04, ... }

# Get all events into your data warehouse
GET /v1/firms/{firm_id}/events?since=...

SDKs: Python · Node.js · Go · REST · gRPC
Typical integration: 2–4 weeks · supported by Arizet integrations team

The revenue side / 05

Not a cost. A revenue stream.

Every platform we listed on the comparison table is a pure cost line on your P&L. MT5 license, bridge, hosting. Outflow, every month, forever. A-Trader breaks the pattern in a way no competitor can copy: 30%+ of active traders on our network subscribe to one or more premium apps. Every subscription is recurring monthly revenue, and a negotiated share flows back to your firm. The first prop firm platform where your trading tech is not just cheaper than the alternatives. It's net positive.

Trader adoption

30%+

Of active traders on the A-Trader network subscribe to one or more premium apps. Higher among prop firm traders specifically. They have skin in the game and reach for tools that compound their edge.

App catalog

7 live, 7 in pipeline. Candle Intelligence, Risk Exposure, VaR Analysis, Trade Analytics, Scenario Testing, Trading Psychology, plus Sentiment Compass, Order Flow, Correlation Hub, Event Impact, and more. Each a credible standalone product; each generating per-subscriber recurring revenue.

Your share

Recurring

A negotiated share of app subscription revenue flows back to your firm. Monthly, automatically, scaling with your trader base. The exact split is negotiated as part of your engagement. No other prop firm platform offers this.

The other platforms cost you money. A-Trader pays you back.

The math on the right is one operator's actual setup at ~5,000 active accounts on the Growth tier. Platform license, minus the institutional risk system they would otherwise license separately (~$30K/month from typical providers), minus the bridge + LP setup costs they'd carry on MT5, plus the recurring revenue share from app subscriptions.

Same operator running MT5 at the same scale: roughly $400K–$1M annual outflow with zero revenue back. A-Trader at the same scale is structurally net positive in dollars actually flowing into the firm.

It's not just cheaper than MT5. It's the only platform that pays.

EXAMPLE · 5,000 ACCOUNTS · GROWTH TIER

A-Trader platform licenseGrowth tier · custom quote −$120K/yr

A-Connect risk systemvalue vs separate provider ~$30K/mo +$360K/yr

A-Connect executionvs MT5 bridge + LP setup costs +$60K/yr

Premium apps revenue share~30% of 5K traders subscribing · % negotiated +$50K–$200K/yr

Net annual position +$350K to +$500K

↳ App revenue assumption deliberately conservative. Actual share negotiated per engagement. The same operator on MT5 ran ~$700K annual outflow at this scale with zero revenue back.

The MT5 escape route / 06

Running MT5? Run the new math.

Most prop firms still pay MT5 because the alternative looks like a project. It isn't. The honest year-one cost comparison below (MT5 stack vs A-Trader for Prop Firms at equivalent scale) adds a column that didn't exist before: net revenue back to your firm. The numbers are operator-reported; we've seen them in dozens of conversations with founders who switched.

Running MT5 in 2026

The old way.

Public costs from MT5 operators running ~5,000 accounts. The bridge and risk-engine costs are real; the "MetaQuotes risk" doesn't show on the spreadsheet until it does. Notice every line is an outflow.

MT5 licensed serverdedicated, compliant · monthly−$10K to −$25K

Bridge / risk enginewhite-label · separately licensed−$3.5K to −$20K

Institutional risk systemseparate vendor · most firms pay this−$30K/mo

Hosting + opsinfra, uptime, DR−$2K to −$5K/mo

Custom indicator devMQL5 contractor work−$3K to −$8K/mo

Platform team headcount1–2 people minimum−$15K to −$30K/mo

Apps revenue back to firmthere's no apps ecosystem to share$0

Trader retention impactchurn from platform dissatisfactionNegative

MetaQuotes shutdown riskprobability per yearNon-zero

Net annual position −$700K to −$1M+

And you compete with the dozens of other MT5 firms on prize size and marketing spend. Your tech is interchangeable with theirs. You can't differentiate on platform because you literally have the same one.

Switching to A-Trader for Prop Firms

The 2026 way.

Equivalent scale on the Growth tier. Platform-only path. No Prop Depot partnership, no equity, no exclusivity. Notice the revenue lines that simply don't exist anywhere else in the category.

A-Trader platform licenseGrowth tier · custom-quoted · scales with seats−illustrative

A-Connect executionmulti-venue routing · <15ms · BYO or use oursIncluded

Institutional risk systemincluded · ~$30K/mo value vs separate provider+$360K/yr

Hosting + opswe operate the platform · you operate the firmIncluded

14 premium appslive + pipeline · trader-facingIncluded

Apps revenue back to firm30%+ of traders subscribe · negotiated share+$50K to +$200K/yr

Strategy Lab accessPython SDK · backtester · marketplaceIncluded

Arena + the Deskretention + education layersIncluded

Vendor / platform riskArizet-owned · skin in the gameAligned

Net annual position +$290K to +$440K

And you compete on platform. Every trader you onboard sees a platform their friends don't have, an apps catalog no MT5 firm can match, and a firm that's investing in their development. That's the only kind of differentiation that compounds.

Deployment tiers / 07

Three deployment tiers. Custom-quoted per engagement.

No surprise per-account fees. No nickel-and-diming on features. Three tiers scoped by account count, with pricing custom-quoted based on your operational scale, integration depth, and revenue-share negotiation. All tiers include the A-Connect institutional risk system (worth ~$30K/month from typical separate providers) and access to the premium app revenue share program. Most prop firms land on Growth. It's the sweet spot for established operators with under 5,000 accounts.

For lean operators

Starter

Talk to usflat license · annual billing · 60-day notice exit

Live in 7 days

Up to 500 active accounts
A-Trader platform · fully branded · your domain
A-Connect execution + institutional risk system
7 live premium apps · revenue share enabled
REST + webhooks for CRM integration
Standard support · email + chat · 12h SLA
Includes 14-day pilot · refundable

↳ For operators with under 500 accounts who want a clean MT5 swap. Premium tech, premium support, premium revenue share. At a starting tier that still saves vs. running MT5 + a separate risk system.

Talk to us about Starter →

Most prop firms land here

Growth

Talk to usscales by account count · annual discounts available

Live in 7–14 days

Up to 5,000 active accounts
Everything in Starter, plus:
Full app suite. 14 apps (live + pipeline as released)
Higher app revenue share band (negotiated)
Strategy Lab access for all your traders
Arena tournaments framework. Host your own competitions
Priority support · dedicated Slack channel
Assigned success manager · monthly cadence
Co-marketing through the Arizet trader audience

↳ The sweet spot. Modern platform, full apps, gamification, real support, meaningful revenue share. Pays for itself in risk-system savings alone. The app revenue share is upside.

Talk to us about Growth →

For scale operators

Enterprise

Talk to usannual contract · negotiable terms · SLAs

Live in 4–6 weeks

Up to 30,000 active accounts
Everything in Growth, plus:
Custom feature development (scoped jointly)
Top-band app revenue share (negotiated)
White-glove integration · dedicated engineering line
SLA commitments. Uptime, latency, support response
On-prem or dedicated cloud deployment option
Direct quant team access (for proprietary risk modeling)
Quarterly executive business review

↳ For operators at 5K+ accounts with custom requirements. Regulatory specifics, proprietary risk models, deep CRM integrations. Most enterprise deals migrate existing books from MT5 with co-engineered transition plans.

Talk to us about Enterprise →

Path to launch / 08

Seven days. Standard launch.

Most operators have lived through 2–4 month MT5 setups, six-month CRM rebuilds, and "two-week" integrations that actually took two quarters. A-Trader for Prop Firms ships in seven days, end to end, in the standard configuration. The reason is structural: we operate the platform, you operate the firm, and the integration surface is well-defined REST and webhooks rather than a black-box bridge to a 2005 server.

Day 1

Tenant + branding

We provision your platform tenant. You provide brand assets (logo, colors, domain). The platform comes up at your-firm.app within the first business day, fully branded.

Days 2–3

API integration

Your CRM developer (or ours, custom-scoped) connects your existing CRM to our account-provisioning API. Trade and risk events route to your existing systems via webhook. No data migration required.

Days 4–5

Programs + rule sets

Your programs (1-step, 2-step, custom challenge structures) get configured in the platform. Pool-level rules. Drawdown logic. News-window restrictions. App entitlements per program tier.

Days 6–7

UAT + launch

Your team runs a controlled UAT. Test trades on test accounts, verify event flow, check brand assets across surfaces. Day 7: you flip the switch. New traders onboard onto the new platform. Existing book stays on whatever it's on, migrates over the following quarter at your pace.

Why us / 09

The platform behind the platform. Built by people who've seen it fail.

Arizet Labs has shipped institutional risk infrastructure for over two decades. The team behind A-Trader has cleaned up after every kind of platform disaster you can imagine. Exchange outages, broker insolvencies, regulatory shutdowns, vendor lock-in bankruptcies. The thing we built first wasn't a flashy frontend. It was the boring, paranoid, compliance-grade infrastructure underneath. The frontend came after, because we wanted it to.

Institutional pedigree

25+

years of risk infrastructure

The Arizet team has built the risk and execution layers that institutional desks rely on. Quietly, under the hood, at scale. The same paranoia that keeps a hedge fund's PMs out of trouble is built into A-Trader from day one. The risk system included with A-Connect reflects that pedigree.

Network volume

$40B+

traded last month, network-wide

A-Trader processed more than $40B in volume across the network in the last month alone. The platform is battle-tested at scale. Peak load, news events, flash moves, the lot. When you bring your firm's flow onto A-Trader, you're joining a stack that's already handling institutional-grade throughput.

Skin in the game

vendor-shutdown risk

Arizet owns A-Trader end-to-end. No MetaQuotes equivalent who can pull the rug. Our shipping cadence is weekly, the roadmap is public, and we share revenue with you via the apps. Meaning when your traders win, we win too. The incentives are structurally aligned.

FAQ / 10

The questions every operator asks.

Below: the questions we get on every initial call. Answered honestly. If your question isn't here, you'll find us responsive. We generally reply to demo requests within a couple of hours during business hours.

How exactly does the apps revenue share work?

Premium app subscriptions are the most important revenue line in A-Trader. Across the network, 30%+ of active traders subscribe to one or more apps. Candle Intelligence, Risk Exposure, Trade Analytics, Trading Psychology, and the rest. Each subscription is recurring monthly revenue billed by the platform. As part of your engagement, a negotiated share of subscription revenue from your traders flows back to your firm monthly. The exact split depends on tier and scale. Growth tier and Enterprise tier get higher bands. The point: no other prop firm platform offers a revenue line back to the firm. This is structurally unique to A-Trader, and it can make the platform net positive on your P&L instead of a cost center.

What about the institutional risk system A-Connect includes?

A-Connect ships with the same institutional risk controls our team built for hedge fund and prop desk infrastructure. Pre-trade checks, exposure limits, drawdown enforcement, news-window lockouts, multi-leg position monitoring, and correlation-aware aggregate risk. Operators we talk to typically license this kind of risk infrastructure separately from specialist vendors for ~$30K/month. Including it with A-Trader for Prop Firms isn't a freebie. It's part of why the platform is structurally cheaper to run than MT5 + a separate risk vendor, before you even factor in app revenue.

How realistic is the simulated / paper trading?

Paper trading on A-Trader uses the same fill engine as live execution. Bid/ask spreads from real market data. Realistic slippage. Same commission and financing logic. The only difference is the orders don't reach the venue. Most platforms run paper trading on a "demo server" with different assumptions than the live server. Which is why traders see great results in demo and immediately blow up in live. Ours match. Funded traders moving from challenge to live on A-Trader don't get the platform-shock that's standard everywhere else.

Do I need to migrate my existing traders off MT5?

No. Most operators keep their existing book on whatever platform it's on, and onboard new traders directly onto A-Trader. Existing traders migrate at their own pace over the following 3–6 months as their accounts cycle or they request the upgrade. We've never seen an operator regret giving the choice to their traders. They almost always choose to migrate within their next funding cycle.

Can I keep my existing CRM (FPFX, Axcera, in-house, etc.)?

Yes. This is the entire point. A-Trader for Prop Firms is platform-only. Your CRM stays where it is. We integrate via REST, gRPC, and webhooks. Your CRM provisions accounts via our API. Trade events, risk events, and payout triggers flow back to your CRM. Total integration work: 2–4 weeks typically. If you'd rather replace your CRM too, talk to us about Prop Depot. That's the full-stack offering.

How does pricing actually scale? What's the catch?

There's no catch in the structure. Three tiers (Starter (up to 500 accounts), Growth (up to 5,000), Enterprise (up to 30,000)) with pricing custom-quoted per engagement based on account count, integration depth, and revenue-share negotiation. No per-trade fees. No per-instrument fees. No "premium support" upcharge. The A-Connect institutional risk system is included in all tiers (typical separate-vendor cost: ~$30K/month). Annual billing gets a 15% discount. And the apps revenue share is structurally a credit against your license cost. At Growth and Enterprise scale, the revenue back often exceeds the license in. Talk to us for your specific quote.

What's the difference between A-Trader for Prop Firms and Prop Depot?

This page is platform-only, just A-Trader, under your brand, on your CRM. Prop Depot is the full-stack partnership: platform plus CRM, KYC, PSP integration, community, marketing engine, and the Freedom Challenge framework. Two different scopes. If you have an existing operation and just want a vastly better platform, you want this page. If you're building from zero (or you want to outsource everything except the brand and the capital) see Prop Depot. Both are real products; same parent company; the apps revenue share applies to both.

What if MetaQuotes shuts down my MT5 server tomorrow?

It's happened to other firms. The MetaQuotes Manager API is not under your control. If you cross a policy line (or they decide your jurisdiction is suddenly disfavored) your platform can be pulled. With A-Trader for Prop Firms, Arizet owns the entire stack: platform, execution layer, risk system, hosting. The platform isn't going anywhere unless we go out of business, and our incentives are aligned with yours (the apps revenue share means we win when your traders win). We can also offer fast-track onboarding (under 72 hours) for operators in active MT5 shutdown scenarios.

Can my traders actually use Strategy Lab too?

Yes, and most operators discover this is a significant retention lever. Strategy Lab access is included for all traders on the Growth and Enterprise tiers. They get the Python SDK, the institutional-grade backtesting engine, paper trading, and access to the library of 400+ forkable strategies. Traders who use Strategy Lab are demonstrably stickier (we have the data). Strategy Lab Pro subscriptions are also part of the apps revenue share program, so your serious quant-leaning traders generate recurring revenue back to your firm too.

How long is the contract? What's the exit?

Annual contracts standard, with a 60-day exit notice clause. Pilot deployments include a 14-day refund window after launch. If it doesn't work for your firm, you walk and we refund the first month. We've structured exits this way deliberately: we'd rather have a clean wind-down than a stuck unhappy customer. To date, the exit clause has been invoked twice, both during pilots, both for legitimate strategic-pivot reasons that had nothing to do with the platform itself.