Arizet Labs
Arizet Risk & Compliance Built for prop firms · live in production
In production · $20M+ saved · prop firm partners · 3 years

$20M+ saved.
Real number. Real partners.

While other firms reject payouts and impose draconian rules (punishing every honest trader to catch a few bad ones) you identify toxic flow surgically. Automated deductions. Fair split adjustments. Traders who stay because the firm treats them right.

Arizet Risk & Compliance has saved prop firm partners $20M+ in toxic-flow leakage and prevented payouts over the last three years. One partner alone at $1.5–2M monthly revenue saved several hundred thousand dollars in a single year. The system pays for itself in under three months on most prop firms above $500K/month revenue, and it does it without the manual flagging, blunt drawdown rules, or opaque interventions that traditional risk approaches rely on. Real-time ML toxic flow detection. Configurable per-program enforcement. Predictive payout liability modeling. Trader Quality scoring. The risk infrastructure prop firms actually need.

Request a live walkthrough → See the ROI math Live deployment · weeks not months · proven track record
Network savings · 3 yrs
$20M+
prevented toxic-flow payouts · real partners
How we charge
30%
of savings we deliver · the other 70% stays with you
Detection latency
Real-time
not weeks-after via spreadsheet
Behavioral signals
14+
Trading Quality engine · patent-pending
Featured product · Available now
Within Arizet Risk & Compliance

Payout Protection. Skill-weighted profit splits.

Pay your best traders 100%. Pay your worst traders fairly. Cut payout liability 30-50%, without rejecting a single trader.

The standalone product addressing the biggest pain in modern prop firms: payout liability exceeding challenge revenue. Instead of tightening rules or rejecting payouts, Payout Protection assigns profit splits dynamically based on a Quality Score per trader, computed daily by Arizet's proprietary Meritix engine across 15+ behavioral metrics. Operator sets target aggregate liability; the engine optimizes individual splits to hit it.

No rule changes. No trader rejections. No customer revolt. Top traders earn up to 100% of their profits, and become your strongest marketing message. The math is auditable, the metrics are public, the defensibility is structural.

See Payout Protection → Book a 20-min demo 7-day integration · Broker API or CSV
Sample outcome · 10 funded traders
Before $400K flat 80% to all
After $300K Quality-weighted
Top 2 traders: 100% split. Marketing-gold publicly. Bottom 4: 10-25%. Mid-tier 60-85%. 25% liability cut, zero rule changes.
The thesis / 01

Most prop firms lose money on payouts they shouldn't be paying. Their risk software can't see it.

A prop firm with $1.5M monthly revenue can quietly leak 10-30% of that through toxic-flow payouts. Copy traders, news arb, latency arb, grid systems that bypass detection, statistical edge exploitation, mule accounts that pass evaluation and immediately collect on funded splits. None of this is illegal trading. All of it is profitable for the trader and ruinous for the firm. And almost none of it is caught by traditional risk tools. They were built to flag drawdown breaches, not behavioral patterns. By the time a human risk officer looks at a spreadsheet on Monday morning, the payout is already wired.

The hard truth in prop tech: most firms don't have a profitability problem. They have a risk infrastructure problem dressed up as a profitability problem.

How prop firm risk usually fails: manual, reactive, blunt.

The typical prop firm risk approach is some combination of: (a) rule-based platform tools flagging hard drawdown breaches, (b) a human risk officer reviewing flagged accounts in a spreadsheet, (c) blanket policies (no news trading windows, no grid trading) enforced manually after the fact, and (d) opaque payout denials that destroy trader trust.

The mismatch is structural. Bad actors operate at sub-second timescales across coordinated accounts. Risk teams operate at "I'll review this Tuesday" timescales across one account at a time. No amount of headcount fixes the latency gap. And blunt rules (e.g., "no news trading") penalize honest traders while sophisticated bad actors simply trade around them.

What Arizet Risk does differently: real-time, predictive, surgical.

Arizet Risk & Compliance is built for the actual latency of the threat. ML models running against live trade flow detect toxic patterns in real time. Copy clusters, latency arb signatures, news-event positioning, grid-system fingerprints, scaling-pattern anomalies. Compliance rules enforce automatically and per-program. Payout liability is modeled predictively based on current account state, regime conditions, and the Trader Quality score.

The Trader Quality engine (14+ behavioral signals, patent-pending) is the deep moat: it doesn't just flag bad behavior in retrospect, it predicts payout liability before the funded account is even cut. Risk officers get exception cases that need human judgement; everything else handles itself in audit trail. The result: surgical enforcement, lower payout leakage, and traders who actually trust the firm.

The comparison / 02

Traditional prop risk vs Arizet Risk. Across thirteen dimensions.

Most prop firms today run risk through some combination of platform-native drawdown rules, manual spreadsheet review by a risk officer, and blanket policy enforcement. This works in 2018. In 2026, with sophisticated copy networks, latency arbitrageurs, and behavioral pattern fraud, it loses you money every month. Compare the approaches across what actually matters.

Dimension
Traditional prop risk approachWhat most firms run today
Arizet Risk & ComplianceML-powered · real-time · surgical
Detection latency
Hours to days · human-in-the-loop review
Real-time · ML models running on live flow
Toxic flow identification
Manual pattern recognition · spreadsheets · post-hoc
Multi-factor ML model · copy clusters, latency arb, news arb, statistical edge exploitation
News trading enforcement
Blanket blackout windows · catches honest traders too
Per-program configurable · pre-event window precision · integration with Event Impact
Copy trading detection
Account-by-account review · misses cross-account patterns
Pattern matching across funded accounts · coordinated trading + mule accounts
Grid & hedge trading rules
Blunt rule (no grid) · sophisticated bad actors trade around it
Automated detection of grid patterns, martingale, cross-account hedging
HFT & overleveraging guardrails
Static leverage caps · doesn't detect velocity patterns
Trade-frequency limits · position-velocity monitoring · per-strategy caps
Real-time exposure tracking
End-of-day or batch · aggregated manually
Live · per-instrument, per-sector, per-region, per-macro-factor · seconds
Payout liability analysis
Backward-looking · what we already paid
Predictive · projected payouts based on current state · regime-conditional
Trader Quality scoring
No equivalent · raw P&L only
Proprietary 14+ signal engine · powers Freedom Challenges + Risk + Pools
Compliance audit trail
Spreadsheets · email threads · partial
Full · per-event · per-trader · per-rule · regulator-grade
Customizable rules engine
Limited · platform-vendor defaults
Compliance team configures · system enforces automatically · auditable
Trader experience impact
Blunt rules + opaque interventions = trust loss
Surgical enforcement only on actual problems · traders trust the firm
Pricing alignment
Flat license · cost center · pay regardless of outcome
Value-share · we earn 30% of documented savings · zero flat license beyond Discovery
Core capabilities / 03

Eight capabilities. One coordinated risk infrastructure.

Each capability exists because a prop firm partner needed it to stop bleeding money. Each is integrated with the others. Same data layer, same audit trail, same source of truth. This is what prop firm risk infrastructure looks like when it's built for the actual threat model of 2026.

01 · ML detection

Toxic flow identification

The flagship capability. A multi-factor ML model running in real time against live trade flow, identifying the patterns that bleed prop firm capital: copy clusters across funded accounts, latency arbitrage signatures, news-event positioning, statistical-edge exploitation, scaling-pattern anomalies. Doesn't replace human risk officers. Surfaces actionable exceptions so they can focus on the cases that need judgement, not on hunting through spreadsheets.

real-time inference · sub-second alerts on live flow multi-factor model · trained on 3+ years of real prop firm flow copy clusters · latency arb · news arb · statistical edge explainable outputs · why this account was flagged
02 · News enforcement

News trading controls

Most firms enforce news rules with blanket pre-event blackouts. Honest traders get punished. Sophisticated bad actors trade around them. Arizet Risk uses per-program configurable windows tied to actual high-impact events (NFP, FOMC, CPI, ECB, BOE), with precision the size of seconds rather than hours. Native integration with the Event Impact app. Your compliance rules know about every macro event automatically, regardless of timezone.

per-program windows · not blanket policies precision: seconds · not hours integration with Event Impact · automatic event calendar differentiated enforcement · evaluation vs funded tiers
03 · Copy detection

Copy trading + mule accounts

The single biggest source of toxic-flow leakage on most prop firms: coordinated trading across multiple accounts, often under different identities. Account farming. Mule accounts that pass evaluation cheaply, then collect on funded splits. Family-and-friends sharing of strategy signals. Arizet Risk detects this through cross-account pattern matching. Entry/exit timing correlation, order-size signatures, instrument concentration overlap, behavioral fingerprint clustering.

cross-account pattern matching · funded base wide entry/exit timing correlation · order-size signatures mule account detection · evaluation-to-funded behavioral shift family-and-friends cluster identification
04 · Grid + hedge

Grid & hedge enforcement

Grid systems and martingale patterns produce the kind of P&L curves that look profitable until they're catastrophic, and they're a known exploit on prop firms with naive risk rules. Cross-account hedging (opening offsetting positions across multiple accounts to lock in guaranteed wins) is similarly devastating. Arizet Risk detects both patterns automatically: position-scaling fingerprints for grids, correlated-but-opposite positioning across accounts for hedge exploits.

grid pattern fingerprinting · martingale detection cross-account hedge detection · across funded base configurable enforcement · warn / suspend / disqualify per-program rules · what's allowed varies by tier
05 · HFT + leverage

HFT & overleveraging

Trade-frequency anomalies and position-velocity violations are early warning signs of automated or semi-automated bad-actor strategies. Static leverage caps don't catch the pattern; you need velocity tracking and rate-of-change monitoring. Arizet Risk runs continuous velocity monitoring with per-strategy, per-instrument leverage exposure caps that adjust dynamically based on the Trader Quality score and program tier.

trade-frequency limits · dynamic per strategy position-velocity monitoring · rate-of-change anomaly per-strategy leverage caps · per-instrument · per-tier integration with Trader Quality · honest traders get more room
06 · Real-time exposure

Aggregate exposure tracking

Firm-wide exposure across all funded accounts, refreshed in seconds. Per instrument. Per sector. Per region. Per macro factor. Identify concentration risks before they become payout events. The "all our funded traders are long EURUSD when ECB speaks" problem is real and expensive. Arizet Risk surfaces it before the speech, not after the payout.

aggregate firm-wide exposure · refresh in seconds per-instrument · per-sector · per-region · per-factor concentration risk alerts · pre-event positioning real-time dashboards · risk officer + CFO views
07 · Predictive liability

Payout liability modeling

The capability that pays for the system: predictive modeling of payout liability based on current account states. Given the current Trader Quality scores, account positions, regime conditions, and historical patterns. What's the projected payout obligation over the next 30/60/90 days? Risk-adjusted reserves automatically calculated. Pre-event stress scenarios run automatically. The CFO sleeps better.

projected payout obligation · 30/60/90 day forward regime-conditional modeling · stress scenarios risk-adjusted reserves · auto-calculated integration with finance · payout pipeline visibility
08 · Trader Quality

Trader Quality scoring

The proprietary 14+ signal engine that quantifies how a trader actually trades, not just whether they pass. Powers Freedom Challenge profit splits in Prop-Tech, gates Pool Manager invitations, and feeds every enforcement rule in Arizet Risk. Consistency. Variance. R-multiple distribution. Drawdown patterns. Plus four proprietary behavioral fingerprint detectors (patent-pending). The deepest moat in the entire Arizet stack.

14+ behavioral signals · continuously refined 4 proprietary detectors · patent-pending fingerprints composite + per-signal breakdown · explainable shared with Prop-Tech · single source of trader truth
09 · Across all of the above

Risk team productivity, multiplied.

Detection is one half of the system. Automation is the other half. The part most prop firms underinvest in. Across every capability above, an automation layer drives what your risk team can actually do per hour: automated trader communications when flags fire, automated payout split adjustments based on Trading Quality scoring, automated deductions on documented toxic-flow events, automated workflow routing to the right person for human review. What used to take a risk officer four hours per case now takes fifteen minutes. Because everything except the actual judgement call happens on its own.

automated client communications · flag alerts · dispute responses · transparent payout split adjustment · live · per Trading Quality + per flagged event automated deductions · on documented toxic-flow trades · full audit trail workflow routing · exception triage · human review only where it matters integration with Prop-Tech operator dashboard · everything in one place risk team productivity · 5–10× · same headcount · far more cases handled
The ROI math / 04

The math works because our incentives are yours.

Most prop firm risk software is sold as a cost center: "you need this to be compliant." Arizet Risk & Compliance is sold on the savings side of the balance sheet. $20M+ across the network in three years isn't a marketing number; it's the cumulative measured savings reported by prop firm partners actually running the system. Below: the math under the value-share model for a representative partner.

Representative partner · $1.5–2M monthly revenue
Monthly revenuechallenge fees + retention $1.5–2M
Toxic-flow leakage · pre-deploymentcopy networks, news arb, mule accounts, grid exploits ~$300K/yr
Discovery phase · months 1–3flat-fee Discovery · then transitions to value-share · talk to us −$24K
Documented savings · months 4–12prevented toxic-flow payouts · partner-reported +$225K
Arizet value-share fee · 30% of savingspaid quarterly · based on measured documented savings −$67.5K
Net position · partner · year 1 +$133.5K
↳ Every dollar we save you: $0.70 stays with you, $0.30 goes to Arizet.
↳ If we save you nothing: you paid for Discovery only, we move on. That's it.
↳ Across the network: $20M+ in cumulative documented savings over 3 years.

The killer line, simply: we only make money when you save money.

Every other risk vendor charges a flat license regardless of outcome. Arizet earns proportionally to the savings we deliver. Meaning we have skin in your game, every quarter, in writing. No other prop tech vendor structures their economics this way.

Why most firms underestimate their leakage

Before deploying Arizet Risk, most partners have no idea how much they're leaking. The blunt instruments they use catch some bad actors but miss the sophisticated ones, and the sophisticated ones have size. Our Discovery diagnostic typically surfaces 2-3x more leakage than the firm thought existed.

Why operators don't churn

Once a partner has run Arizet Risk for one quarter, the picture of where their money was actually leaking is too clear to give up. Going back to "manual flagging + spreadsheet review" is a step into the dark. And under value-share pricing, there's no flat license cost to walk away from.

How we engage / 05

Two phases. Aligned with your success.

We don't charge for risk software the way other vendors do. We charge for the savings we actually deliver, and we only know how much we can save you after we've spent 2-3 months getting to know your specific firm: your challenge rules, your trader base, your platform stack, your historical leakage patterns. That's the only way to make value-share pricing fair and meaningful for both sides.

Phase one · onboarding

Discovery

Talk to us first 2–3 months · flat fee · then transitions to Phase Two

The exploratory engagement. Extremely low cost relative to what you're getting. A senior team running deep diagnostics on your specific firm, building your ML baseline, integrating to your stack, configuring rules for your programs. By month three we know exactly how much we can save you.

  • Top-notch consulting. Senior quant + risk leadership engaged directly
  • Tech provisioning. Full system stood up on your firm
  • Platform integrations. Your existing CRM & trading stack
  • Historical pipelines. Your trade flow ingested for ML baseline
  • Rules configured. To your specific challenge programs
  • Diagnostic report. What's leaking, what we can save, projected year-one
Start Discovery →
The long-term relationship
Phase two · partnership

Value-share

~30% of savings contact us for more · custom by firm · the other 70% is yours

Once Discovery has quantified what we can save you, we shift to value-share pricing: we earn approximately 30% of the documented savings we deliver each quarter; you keep the other 70%. The exact rate is contracted upfront based on your firm size, challenge rules, trader base, and the leakage patterns we identified during Discovery.

  • Quarterly settlement. Measured savings · agreed methodology
  • Aligned incentives. We earn more when you save more
  • No flat license fees. Beyond the Discovery period
  • Custom contracts. Sized to your firm specifics
  • Full system access. All 8 capabilities · continuously improved
  • Quarterly business review. Savings audit · model improvements
Contact us about Partnership →
"
"
The pricing philosophy

If we can't help you save real money,
we will fire you as a client.

No vendor in prop tech can say that with a straight face. Because every other vendor's economics depend on collecting flat fees regardless of outcome. Ours don't. If we can't move the needle for your firm, the relationship doesn't make sense for either of us.

Bundle pricing: Operators running Risk & Compliance with Arizet Prop-Tech (CRM OS) get meaningful Discovery-phase discounts and reduced value-share rates. The two systems share Trading Quality scoring and compliance data. Single source of truth across operations and risk.
FAQ / 06

The questions operators ask first.

Is the "$20M+ saved" number real?
+
Yes. It's the cumulative documented savings across prop firm partners running Arizet Risk & Compliance over the last three years. "Documented" means partner-reported and verifiable through the system's own audit trail. Prevented toxic-flow payouts, blocked grid exploits, denied news-arb fills, mule account interventions. We're happy to talk through the methodology under NDA on the first call.
Do I have to use Arizet Prop-Tech (CRM) to run Risk & Compliance?
+
No. Risk & Compliance runs standalone against your existing CRM and trading platforms via API. We integrate to the major platforms (A-Trader, MT5, Match-Trader, TradeLocker, cTrader, DXtrade) and pull flow data directly. If you also run Arizet Prop-Tech, the two integrate natively. Trading Quality scores from the CRM feed Risk enforcement, and compliance flags from Risk surface in the Prop-Tech operator dashboard. Two products, bundled discount available.
How fast can you deploy against my existing trader base?
+
2 to 4 weeks from contract to live. Phase one (week 1): API integration with your platforms and CRM, historical flow ingestion for the ML baseline. Phase two (weeks 2-3): diagnostic run against your existing book. We typically surface 2-3x more leakage than the firm expected, with full audit trail. Phase three (week 4): rules engine configured to your specific programs, monitoring live, compliance team trained.
How explainable are the ML detections to traders and regulators?
+
Fully explainable. Every flag the system raises includes a breakdown of which signals contributed and to what degree: "this account was flagged because of (1) entry-timing correlation with three other funded accounts, (2) order-size signature match, (3) instrument concentration overlap of 87%." Your compliance officer can defend any enforcement decision. Regulators get a one-click report. Traders can see exactly what behaviors triggered the action (when you choose to disclose, which is your call per program).
Won't aggressive risk enforcement hurt my trader brand?
+
The opposite, actually. Most prop firms hurt their brand by being blunt and reactive. Blanket news blackouts that punish honest traders, opaque payout denials, "we suspect you of grid trading" emails to people who weren't grid trading. Arizet Risk enforces surgically: it only flags real patterns, with explainable reasons, and honest traders get more room to operate (the Trader Quality score literally rewards them). The compliance interventions get sharper while the trader experience gets better.
What does "30% of savings" actually mean in practice?
+
Every quarter, we settle on documented savings. Documented means measured against the Discovery baseline (your pre-Arizet leakage rate, established during months 1-3). Every blocked payout, every prevented mule account, every caught grid exploit, every prevented news-arb fill, captured in the system's audit trail. We tally that quarterly. You pay 30% of that documented total. The other 70% stays with you. The methodology is contracted upfront and reviewed quarterly. No surprises, no creative math on either side. For some firms (very small, or very specific risk profiles) we'll contract a different percentage upfront; the 30% is typical but it's negotiable based on your firm.
What if my firm is small? Does value-share pricing still work?
+
Yes. It works better for small firms, actually. Smaller prop firms can't justify the $15K-$35K monthly licenses that most risk vendors charge for serious infrastructure. Value-share pricing means smaller firms get the same world-class detection technology, but only pay proportionally to what's actually being saved. The Discovery phase (flat monthly fee for 2-3 months) is the only fixed cost, and if the diagnostic shows we can't materially help, we'll tell you on the spot and you can walk away. No long-term contract beyond that.
Do you replace our human risk officer?
+
No. We make them dramatically more effective. Your risk officer's time should go to judgement calls on the borderline cases that need human review, not to spreadsheet hunting for patterns they can't even see at the right latency. Arizet Risk handles the automated detection and enforcement; the human risk team focuses on the ~5% of cases where context and discretion actually matter. Most partners report their risk team feels more strategic, not less needed.
"You'll fire us as a client". Is that a real policy or just marketing?
+
Real policy. Under value-share, we only earn when you save. If after Discovery we determine we can't generate enough savings to make the partnership economically sensible for both sides (because your firm has unusually clean flow already, or your scale is below the threshold where the math works, or your specific challenge structure doesn't have the leakage patterns we can address), we'll say so, and either restructure to a simple consulting engagement, or end the relationship. We'd rather lose a client than waste their money or our team's time on a partnership where neither side comes out ahead.
What if I sign Discovery and decide not to continue to Partnership?
+
You walk away. Discovery is bounded. Flat monthly fee for 2-3 months, full stop. If at the end you decide not to move to Phase Two, the relationship ends cleanly. You keep the written diagnostic report (worth significantly more than the Discovery fee on its own, it tells you exactly where you're leaking and what it would take to fix), and our system is decommissioned from your stack. No lock-in. No exit penalty. No "but you committed to a year" surprises. The Discovery phase is genuinely designed as a low-risk exploratory engagement for both sides.
Talk to us / 07

Request a 30-minute walkthrough. Or start Discovery.

What the first call covers.

30 minutes. Live sandbox demo. NDA available before any sensitive details are shared. You see ML toxic flow detection running on representative data, compliance rules firing in real time, Trader Quality scoring updating, payout liability modeling on a sample book.

If the call lands well, the natural next step is a Discovery engagement. A flat-fee 2-3 month diagnostic where we map exactly what we can save you on your specific firm. By the end of Discovery we'll know exactly what we can save you and quote value-share terms; if the numbers don't make sense for either side, we say so.

↳ Or just email us: connect@arizet.com
↳ Atlanta: +1 470-673-7983

REQUEST A WALKTHROUGH
Response within 2 hours during business days · NDA available pre-call.
Arizet Labs

$20M+ saved.
And that's just so far.

Three years live. Real partners. Real toxic-flow savings. Discovery is a flat-fee diagnostic, then we transition to value-share. If we can't help you save real money, we'll fire you as a client.

Request a walkthrough → Back to Arizet Labs